I tried to put bits about testing a program and finding errors all through this. But we never wrote any really big programs, and I wanted to sum up, plus mention some common debugging tricks.
The main trick to debugging code is to write a little, and then test. Put another way, it seems like it would be easier to just not make any mistakes, but that never happens.
The quickest way to get a working program is to write a little, test, write a little
more, and so on.
Some of why that’s true:
Having two bugs at once is horrible, especially if they overlap. You could fix one
and not even know. Testing as you go is much more likely to find one error at a
You might have a bad plan. Early testing tends to find it before you
write lots of stuff that needs to be torn out later when you finally see the
Sometimes part of your programs are basically copies. It’s better to find bugs in
the original before making 3 copies of the same error.
You’ll have to test everything anyway. At some point you’ll have an error where you can’t even imagine what’s causing it. This doesn’t seem possible: if something is in the wrong spot, the error is obviously in the equation. But there are times when you’ve checked the obvious places, and they’re fine. Something that can’t be causing the error, is causing the error. The only way to find it is to test every part.
Put another way, after you write a simple function that can’t possibly be wrong, there’s 100% chance of it being a suspect later on. You will definitely at some point think “well, maybe the problem is here – I never tested it”.
If there are any commands I’m not sure about, I usually write a small, separate program to test them.
For example, Unity can use “layers” to make a Raycast ignore certain objects. If
that sounds great for what you need, make a small test with fresh Cubes. Assume
there’s a least one thing you don’t understand, because there always is, and try to
New language features – anything big – usually take an entire practice project
to learn. If you start using a new feature in a real project, it pretty much
automatically turns into a practice project. In other words. you can write a
useful program, or you can write a program to learn something new. But not
You don’t have to start writing the first part of the program first. You can write functions, then test them with fake function calls in Start.
Typical tests are “sanity checks” where you run it with really easy inputs where you know the answer. Another is an edge-case: try numbers just before and after cut-offs. If something checks for out-of-bounds, try things that are barely out, barely in, and use every boundary.
Most bugs are in things that you don’t test, not even once, since there’s no way it
can be wrong.
A test-loop can try lots of numbers, with an if to check that the results are
at least close. Sometimes you have to be creative – if a function checks a
10x10 board, you’ll have to fake one up. That seems like a lot of work, but
you’ll have to do it anyway when you get the first impossible to track down
You can test a main part of the program by faking up functions. If something is suppose to read user input, you can have it temporarily give a random, legal number. If a function is suppose to decide where to walk next, it can temporarily pick 20 feet ahead, or a random spot.
No matter how much you test, there’s always some bug that pops up out of nowhere. Here’s are some tricks to track it down:
Usually more testing will give clues about where the problem really is, or isn’t.
Some specific tricks:
Add “is this even running?” print statements. If your function to align text isn’t working, it might be because it never got called. If your function to make 10 Cubes is mistakenly making 20, it may be working just fine, but was called twice. Run and then check to see it ran everyplace it should, and nowhere it shouldn’t:
You can see the stack trace from a print statement. It will list all functions that
were called to get to this one. Suppose blocks are removed for no reason. Add a print
in the removeBlock function – it will show you exactly who’s calling it when they
To really check a function, print all of the values. After running, check to see which ones are wrong:
Sometimes a function is called too much to read everything it might print. You can narrow it down with if’s. This only prints for a Player input:
Occasionally you have a problem caused by reading old data. I like to sometimes change-up a print statement to check. If the first line in Start changes to "In Start version II" and the output is "in Start", you know something is very wrong.
You may have been reading old output this entire time. Or the system may not
have been reading your changes. You may need to find a Recompile-All option, or a
way to delete old files to force it to recompile.
Sometimes you can’t find a nullReferenceException because of a chain. In the code below, the null could be in c1 or favoriteDog or in gg, or there could be no renderer:
To track it down, it can be broken into single steps, with prints in-between:
That seems like a lot of typing, but it’s better than sitting around thinking
“favoriteDog must be null, right? I mean, all dogs have a gg and a renderer, don’t
Sometimes it helps to temporarilty simplify the program. If the customer
data isn’t being displayed correctly, it probably wasn’t caused when you
computed their order. But it could have been. Comment that out. Simplify the
program a little bit at a time by commenting out parts. With luck, removing
one thing will cause the error to vanish – you found the part causing the
If the problem is with a feature you’re not very experienced using, test it in a
different mini-program. For example, if this is only the second time you’ve used
Unity’s OnCollisionStay, make a very simple demo of how your real program uses it.
There may have been a few things you misunderstood.
Some specific Unity tips:
Be very careful about hacks. For example, you can’t fix the bug when x<0.
Instead you add an extra if statement in Update to manually fix it. Those things
usually turn into super hard-to-find bugs later. If you have to – your demo is tonight
– put a big comment HACK FOR BUG #258
Be sure to remove all of your test lines. I once spent 15 minutes trying to figure
out why it always jumps to stage 4. It was an old testing line that jumped to stage 4.
Write them down, or make then super-easy to see, or reload your backed-up
When you fix a bug, take some time to remember exactly what fixed it. Maybe
write down problem/solution. It’s very common to see a similar bug and all you can
remember is “I tried this, looked here for a long time, but the problem was …arrg! I
Don’t make casual fixes. When you’re looking through a function for a bug, it’s irresistible to do a little clean up and quickly fix things that are “obviously” wrong. That seems crazy – who would do that? But when you see i<L.Count-2 in a loop, it’s so, so hard not to think “minus 2? How did that get there? I can save so much time if I fix it now”.